Longer articles are compiled to preserve content for longer, while random thoughts are recorded as ideas that are still evolving. Both are forms of genuine creation.
My approach to breaking down the goal is to first build a minimal, movable framework, and then gradually add the details that don't affect the overall structure. Later, I discovered that many people have discussed this approach, and each has even given it a name.
When other people's skills and workflows can be directly applied, we experience less friction when adapting to the framework, but those blind spots are also skipped along with it.
Those with real talent often lose to those who are good at advocating for themselves. What about those caught in the middle, who don't rely on word-of-mouth or are skilled in marketing? This is a still-growing thought.
During the days my account was suspended, I actually wrote more than usual. I talked about how the platform's format subtly reversed what I could create, and how I managed to get the order of my creations back.
Threads, Instagram, and Facebook were permanently suspended on the same day because the users were "under 13 years old." This is a record of my emotional shifts over the past few days: an unexpected sense of relief, and a rethinking of why I even bother running my own media platform.
Reflections after reading Ethan Mollick's "Choosing to Stay Human": Why AI content makes people uncomfortable, what is the purpose of using AI (learning, completing tasks, or expressing oneself) before using it, and how to make AI a trigger that "pushes you back to think".
I used to really think that as long as a chair could be sat on, it was fine. I was just sitting and using the computer anyway, so what difference did it make? But if you need one…